A working paper with a DOI: The cliff of innovation

I have published a working paper, and this is a short note on what is in it and where to read it.

The title is The cliff of innovation: why integration, not construction, is the hard part of building a system that acts inside a company. Nine pages. It is deposited on Zenodo with a DOI, 10.5281/zenodo.22704763, which means the file will still resolve when the places that host it today do not. It is self-published and not peer reviewed, and it says so on the first page.

What it argues, in one paragraph. There is a point in building something new where the hard part changes kind. Below that point, the difficulty is building: writing the code, making it run. At that point, which I call the cliff of innovation, almost every part you need already exists, made by different people for different purposes, and the difficulty becomes integrating them well enough that the result behaves like one system rather than a collection of parts. For a system that acts inside a company, four things are missing in every company I have seen, and they are not parts you can buy: a written account of what is true, which rules the business already follows, which actions can be undone, and who may approve what.

What is in the paper that is not in the short version on my site: the five seams by which you can recognise a badly integrated system from the chair of the person using it; a worked example of the permission table, row by row; the scope the method is running on, as stated in our technical report; three predictions dated for 2028 so that they can be checked; and a section on the paper's own limits, including the conflict of interest of a co-founder writing about his company's method.

Where to read it: the PDF on my site, https://isaac-correa.github.io/the-cliff-of-innovation-isaac-correa.pdf, the record on Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22704763, and the copy on Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/175376622/. The short version is at https://isaac-correa.github.io/cliff/.

If you read it and find one of the three predictions already wrong, I would rather hear it than not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six pages I added this week, and what each one is for

Who cited Isaac Correa, and what they were actually looking for

Isaac Correa: who I am, and where every fact can be checked